Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
t. e. Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the areas of constitutional law and administrative law. The Court held that, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in most circumstances the government cannot deport someone to a country where they risk being ...
Canada (AG) v Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689 is a leading immigration case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on test for determining a "well-founded fear of persecution" in order to make a claim for Convention refugee status. The Court held that persecution need not originate from the state, and that mere inability to provide protection is ...
Rosalie Abella, Andromache Karakatsanis. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that clarified the determination and application of standard of review in Canadian administrative law. Vavilov applies “a presumption that reasonableness is the applicable ...
Berezovsky v Michaels. Berezovsky v Michaels [1] is an English libel decision in which the House of Lords allowed Boris Berezovsky and Nikolai Glushkov to sue Forbes (via editor James Michaels) for libel in UK courts, despite the allegedly libelous material relating to their activities in Russia . The case was also reported as Berezovsky v ...
Lamer CJ and Major J took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817 is a leading Canadian administrative law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court provided guidance on the standard of judicial review of administrative decisions.
The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial. The Constitution of Canada gives the federal Parliament of Canada ...
Full case name: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v. Sukhvir Singh Khosa: Citations: 2009 SCC 12, [2009] 1 SCR 339: Docket No. 31952 : Prior history: Judgment for Khosa in the Federal Court of Appeal. Ruling: Appeal allowed. Holding; Courts should give a measure of deference to administrative tribunal decisions.
The nation’s 700-plus immigration judges are the people who decide whether migrants seeking asylum in the United States can remain in the country legally, and they currently face a record ...