Money A2Z Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. How to Do a Free Reverse Phone Lookup & the 8 Best ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/finance/free-reverse-phone-lookup-8...

   3. Spokeo. You may have heard of Spokeo, since it’s a very popular site for looking up phone numbers. When you conduct a search, you can get the person’s name, email, home address and social ...

3. Spokeo - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo

   Spokeo was founded in 2006 by four graduates from Stanford University — Mike Daly, Harrison Tang, Ray Chen, and Eric Liang. [ 3] The original idea of aggregating social media results came from Tang. The four founders developed the idea in early 2006, using Tang's parents’ basement. [ 4] On November 5, 2006, the site officially launched ...

4. These are the most common names for Ivy League grads - AOL

   www.aol.com/most-common-names-ivy-league...

   A Spokeo study has delved into the most common name for Ivy League graduates, to see what future names parents should consider for any future Yalies, Tigers, or Harvard grads.

5. Be on the lookout for these common phone scam area codes - AOL

   www.aol.com/lookout-common-phone-scam-area...

   Spokeo fills you in on what you need to know about phone scam calls and how to get rid of the bothersome numbers. ... If you don't live near these locations or know people in them, good chance a ...

6. Whitepages (company) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitepages_(company)

   Whitepages was founded in 1997 as a hobby for then- Stanford student Alex Algard. It was incorporated in 2000 and received $45 million in funding in 2005. Investors were later bought-out by Algard in 2013. From 2008 to 2013, Whitepages released several mobile apps, a re-design in 2009, the ability for consumers to control their contact ...

7. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

   Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]