Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, announced the investigation in a speech delivered to a joint session of the 107th United States Congress on September 20, 2001, following the coordinated attacks on September 11. It was considered one of the most important events during his first term (2001–2005) and demonstrated his ...
English: Original caption: Washington, D.C. — President George W. Bush addresses the nation from the Oval Office regarding the terrorist attacks on the United States. Date Taken on 11 September 2001
U.S. President Bush speaks with New York governor George Pataki and New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani two days following the September 11 attacks, on September 13, 2001. After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States government responded by commencing immediate rescue operations at the World Trade Center site, grounding civilian aircraft, and beginning a long-term response that ...
Former President George W. Bush speaks during a 9/11 commemoration at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pa. (Mandel Ngan/AFP) (MANDEL NGAN via Getty Images)
September 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, heart-wrenching images surfaced and stirred the world. Photos released by the US National Archives in 2016 show ...
Author Peter Baker discusses Bush’s push against anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination after the attacks on Sept. 11. 2001. George W. Bush: Standing up for tolerance after 9/11 [Video] Skip to ...
The 2002 State of the Union Address was given by the 43rd president of the United States, George W. Bush, on January 29, 2002, at 9:00 p.m. EST, in the chamber of the United States House of Representatives to the 107th United States Congress. [1] [2] It was Bush's first State of the Union Address and his second speech to a joint session of the ...
In political communication, the phrase " you are either with us, or against us " and similar variations are used to generate polarisation and reject non-partisanship. [citation needed] The implied consequence of not joining the partisan effort of the speaker is to be deemed an enemy. A contemporary example is the statement of former US ...