Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Litigation involving Apple Inc. The multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in litigation in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as ...
35 U.S.C. ยง 289. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones ...
Apple Inc. United States, et al. v. Apple Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. in 2024. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that Apple violated antitrust statutes. [ 1][ 2] The lawsuit contrasts the practices of Apple with those of Microsoft in United States v.
Milberg LLP Announces Pendency of Class Action Lawsuit Against Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) - grouponstockclassaction.com NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Milberg LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has ...
With all this back history, Groupon wanted Google's offer to include a substantial break-up fee in case the deal fell apart, Business Insider said. But it named a number that was too much for ...
Groupon, Inc. is an American global e-commerce marketplace connecting subscribers with local merchants by offering activities, travel, goods and services in 13 [ 2] countries. Based in Chicago, Groupon was launched there in November 2008, launching soon after in Boston, New York City and Toronto. By October 2010, Groupon was available in 150 ...
Groupon has launched a new iPad app to replace cash registers, reduce credit card transaction fees, and become more than a deals site for local businesses. Dubbed "Breadcrumb POS," Groupon touts ...
Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), [1] was a landmark decision of the Delaware Supreme Court on hostile takeovers. The Court declared that, in certain limited circumstances indicating that the "sale" or "break-up" of the company is inevitable, the fiduciary obligation of the directors of a target corporation are narrowed significantly, the singular ...