Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Is the 15th Amendment being violated? A compelling argument for Mr. Trump’s liability with regards to the cases his campaign, and those of his supporters, that have been brought to the several courts across the country. “Trump’s post-election barrage of specious lawsuits ( 32 losses in 34 cases, so far) is not enough on its own to support ...
The decisions referenced were related to the Voting Rights Act and other laws protecting those 15th Amendment rights. Whether that authority extends to overruling fraud prevention measures enacted by the States is questionable, but even if it is Constitutional to meddle in such election integrity measures, it is still a profoundly bad idea.
Previous Post Is the 15th Amendment being violated? Next Post Coronavirus likely in US in mid-December according to donated blood samples. 27 thoughts on “ Originalists and Textualists arise and be counted for census case…or not.
Moderna ready fo EUA After Pfizer announced readiness a week ago, Moderna is now ready as well. Pfizer has an FDA meeting for an EUA on Dec 10, Moderna is not yet scheduled.
This year also marks both the 150th anniversary of the ratification of the 15th Amendment, which prohibited denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude, and the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment, which prohibited denial of the right to vote based on sex.
Somebody has to enforce the Constitution With only razor thin control of Congress, Biden has issued 60% more executive orders than any other President at this point in his term, many trying to bypass the legislative process to make fundamental change that should be fairly debated and adopted in a bipartisan matter, or not at…
Kentucky tried to add an amendment to their constitution to ban abortion. It was voted down 52.4% to 47.6%. In Vermont there was a proposal to create a constitutional right to personal reproductive autonomy. It won by a vote of 77.2% to 22.8%
Thus the case establishes a precedent that First Amendment law can be ignored in cases where the complaint is tried as a Conspiracy Against Rights. Should the conviction survive appeals, the government will be empowered to abridge the right of free speech just by — in effect — calling speech something different.
This is not a “First Amendment Case.” It is a defamation case. Fox News can say what they want without government interference – that is their First Amendment right. But, they are not immune from the consequences of how they exercise that right. Like Liked by 1 person
Garland Evasive before Senate. Merrick Garland, in his testimony before the Senate seeking confirmation as Attorney General is setting records for evasiveness when questioned on important issues. “I know nothing about…” was a common answer when queried about important matters he would be making decisions on.