Money A2Z Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hardness comparison - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardness_comparison

    Hardness comparison. A variety of hardness -testing methods are available, including the Vickers, Brinell, Rockwell, Meyer and Leeb tests. Although it is impossible in many cases to give an exact conversion, it is possible to give an approximate material-specific comparison table for steels.

  3. USRA Light Santa Fe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USRA_Light_Santa_Fe

    The USRA Light Santa Fe was a USRA standard class of steam locomotive designed under the control of the United States Railroad Administration, the nationalized railroad system in the United States during World War I. These locomotives were of 2-10-2 wheel arrangement in the Whyte notation, or 1′E1′ in UIC classification; this arrangement ...

  4. Brinell scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brinell_scale

    The "10" is the ball diameter in millimeters. The "3000" is the force in kilograms force. The hardness may also be shown as XXX HB YYD 2. The XXX is the force to apply (in kgf) on a material of type YY (5 for aluminum alloys, 10 for copper alloys, 30 for steels). Thus a typical steel hardness could be written: 250 HB 30D 2. It could be a ...

  5. 'Uninhabitable for weeks or months': Why Helene's hurricane ...

    www.aol.com/uninhabitable-weeks-months-why-helen...

    Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. Category 5 hurricane (major): 157 mph or higher Catastrophic damage will occur: A high percentage of framed homes will be destroyed ...

  6. Scaled ground cuckoo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_ground_cuckoo

    However, BirdLife International's Handbook of the Birds of the World (HBW) treats it as a subspecies of the rufous-vented ground cuckoo (N. geoffroyi), and the SACC is seeking a proposal to possibly reevaluate their treatment. [3] [2] [4] [1] This article follows the majority treatment as a species. It is monotypic. [2]

  7. Chesapeake and Ohio class T-1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chesapeake_and_Ohio_class_T-1

    History and design. The Chesapeake and Ohio tested an Erie Railroad Berkshire locomotive, then stretched the design by adding one more driving axle, creating the 2-10-4. The T-1s were equipped with a trailing truck booster that exerted 15,275 pounds of tractive effort. They could pull the same train as a 2-8-8-2 H-7 and do it faster.

  8. Pennsylvania Railroad class J1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Railroad_class_J1

    Pennsylvania Railroad class J1. Water cap. 124 scrapped, 6435 rumored to still extant but not confirmed. The PRR J1 was a class of 2-10-4 "Texas" type steam locomotives built between 1942 and 1944. The J1 had over 95,000 pounds-force (422.6 kN) of tractive effort, plus an additional 15,000 lbf (66.7 kN) if the booster engine was used.

  9. WD Austerity 2-10-0 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WD_Austerity_2-10-0

    It had a parallel boiler and round-topped firebox.While the 2-8-0 had a narrow firebox, the 2-10-0 had a wide firebox placed above the driving wheels. This arrangement was common in the United States (e.g. the USRA 0-8-0) but unusual in Britain, where wide fireboxes were usually used only where there was a trailing bogie, e.g. in 4-4-2 and 4-6-2 types.