Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In technical and common parlance, the phrase "chronological order" indicates that the items are in order of occurrence or creation, oldest first (being the first in the chronology). So it's [ 1997, 1998, 1999 ] and not [ 1999, 1998, 1997 ].
chronological: arranged in or according to the order of time. Quoting the Cambridge dictionary: chronological: following the order in which a series of events happened. Does that mean that “chronological” can not refer to future events? E.g. would the following usage be incorrect? I listed the concerts I'm planning to go to in chronological ...
Reverse chronological: Date.now; Date.now - 1 (yesterday) Date.now - 2; Chronological. Date.oldest; Date.now (today) The word chronological(ly) technically refers to time in a natural order: Year 0, Year 1, ... Reverse chronological therefore is the order reversed.
The reverse chronological order format calls for the most recent work experience to appear first in the document, while the oldest experience appears last. You can set the context (perhaps an always visible heading) as "In Reverse Chronological Order" and number the history items starting at 1. If explicit labeling of each item is desired, they ...
The chronological order makes sense. "At the same time I finished reading Dracula, Mum finished vacuuming the floor." In this case, it is clear that I finished reading Dracula and Mum finished vacuuming at the same time. The chronological order is fine. "When I finished reading Dracula, Mum vacuumed the living room."
Merriam-Webster's definition of chronological: of, relating to, or arranged in or according to the order of time. The spatially equivalent adjective I'm looking for would, ideally, be defined as: of, relating to, or arranged in or according to the order in space. American Heritage's definition of chronology: The arrangement of events in time.
If you really need to write dates in a consise format, I recommend YYYY-MM-DD format. +1 for YYYY-MM-DD format, which has the additional benefit of automatically sorting into chronological order when sorted alphanumerically by computers. I'll use "1 Apr 2010" in software that is trying to be concise but user friendly.
As an example, I might say: The definitions below are given in _ order. sorted: organized, arranged. appearance: the act of becoming visible. bibliography: a list of books referred to in a scholarly work. alphabetically: ordering where strings are placed in order based on the position of characters in the conventional ordering of an alphabet ...
It means something like "relating to the order in which things are written down or expressed"; not, however, the the order in a dictionary (that would be "lexicographical") but rather the order in normal writing.
While I agree with your Presidents example, I believe that there's an implied ordering when one uses "Most Recent Events" as a header for a listing of events, i.e.: the (one) most recent event is the event that happened most recently in the past; the (three) most recent events would likely be ordered in a sequence such that the single most recent event were at the top of that list.