Money A2Z Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 1996 California Proposition 209 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_California...

    Elections in California. Proposition 209 (also known as the California Civil Rights Initiative or CCRI) is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit state governmental institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment ...

  3. Affirmative action in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the...

    Sowell writes that affirmative action policies encourage non-preferred groups to designate themselves as members of preferred groups [i.e., primary beneficiaries of affirmative action] to take advantage of group preference policies; that they tend to benefit primarily the most fortunate among the preferred group (e.g., upper and middle class ...

  4. Project 2025 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

    A DOJ reformed along the recommendations of Project 2025 would combat "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," citing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Former DOJ official under then President Trump, Gene Hamilton argues that "advancing the interests of certain segments of American society... comes at the expense of other Americans ...

  5. Affirmative action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action

    Affirmative action in New Zealand is most often done indirecttly by encouraging those in groups favored by affirmative action to get jobs in sectors they are underrepresented in. Diversity Awards NZ is an organization in New Zealand whose goal is to " celebrate excellence in workplace diversity, equity and inclusion."

  6. Schuette v. BAMN - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schuette_v._BAMN

    U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Schuette v. BAMN, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment 's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states ...

  7. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court held that race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions processes violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  8. Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopwood_v._Texas

    Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 ( 5th Cir. 1996), [1] was the first successful legal challenge to a university's affirmative action policy in student admissions since Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. [2] In Hopwood, four white plaintiffs who had been rejected from University of Texas at Austin 's School of Law challenged the ...

  9. Gratz v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratz_v._Bollinger

    Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points towards admission to ...