Money A2Z Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    I, XIV. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. [1] [2] The decision held that if a plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit is a public ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Government-subsidized speech. Cases about restrictions on speech by third parties funded by the government. Rust v. Sullivan (1991) Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001) Obscenity Generally. Cases concerned with the definition of obscenity and whether a particular work or type of material is obscene. Roth v. United States (1957) Alberts v.

  4. New York Times Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v...

    U.S. Const. amend. New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. The ruling made it possible for The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers to publish the then- classified Pentagon Papers without risk of ...

  5. Freedom of speech in schools in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in...

    The issue of school speech or curricular speech as it relates to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution has been the center of controversy and litigation since the mid-20th century. The First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech applies to students in the public schools. In the landmark decision Tinker v.

  6. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  7. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from ...

  8. Gitlow v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitlow_v._New_York

    Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had extended the First Amendment 's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S. states.

  9. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech...

    Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech". The case was brought against the U.S. government by the Free Speech Coalition, a "California ...